What should be done if two regulations contradict each other?

Choosing the most stringent regulation to follow is essential in maintaining the highest level of safety and compliance. In situations where conflicting regulations exist, adhering to the stricter standard not only mitigates potential legal risks but also protects public health and safety. The rationale behind this approach is that more stringent regulations generally reflect a higher level of precaution and consideration for potential hazards.

Selecting the most rigorous regulation ensures that all safety measures are adequately addressed and that there is no lapse in protection. This is crucial in industries such as asbestos remediation, where the health implications can be severe if safety protocols are not stringently followed. Not adhering strictly to the more stringent guideline can lead to serious consequences, including legal liabilities, increased exposure risks, and damage to reputation.

Consulting a legal expert or regulatory agency can also be a good practice to ensure proper guidance in complex situations. However, relying on the most stringent regulation proactively ensures that you're operating at the safest level while also upholding any necessary legal standards.