Which type of liability is most commonly used against inspectors?

Regulatory liability refers to the responsibilities and potential consequences that inspectors may face under specific regulations and laws governing their industry. In the context of asbestos inspections, this type of liability is particularly relevant because inspectors must comply with strict regulatory standards set by agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

Inspectors can be held accountable if they fail to adhere to these regulations, which may involve improper handling of asbestos, inadequate reporting, or failure to follow safety protocols. Regulatory liability emphasizes the legal implications of non-compliance with established standards, making it a significant concern for inspectors whose work directly impacts public health and safety.

While civil liability might involve lawsuits for damages, and criminal liability could pertain to offenses that violate laws, regulatory liability specifically targets adherence to institutional rules and the standards set forth for inspectors in their field. Therefore, it encapsulates the primary framework within which inspectors can be held accountable for their performance, making it the most applicable form of liability in this context.